Catalonia speaks to Biafra
Separatist struggles are hazardous everywhere. It is as much
the case in perhaps every nation of the world as it is in the staunched
aspiration for Biafra secession in Nigeria. Just take a look at Spain, and you
would see a country that had a huge dose of the attendant animus in the past
week.
Catalonia – an autonomous region of Spain – had lately
revved up its quest to cut loose from the country, thus escalating a standoff
with the Spanish government. Catalan leader Carles Puigdemont last Tuesday
walked the tight rope by signing a unilateral declaration that gave his region all-clear
to break away from Spain, while simultaneously dialing down on the region’s
bluster to immediately spring free. Puigdemont said the effect of the
declaration was being suspended for some weeks as his government sought
dialogue with the Spanish state to resolve the self-determination dispute. Catalonia
is one of Spain’s wealthiest regions, accounting for a quarter of the country’s
exports, and separatists have argued that they yield far more to the national
treasury than they get.
If he gambled on forcing the hand of Spain, the Catalan
leader drew a blank. He was backed up the wall by Madrid, which on Wednesday
issued him an eight-day ultimatum to drop the independence bid or the region
risked losing its constitutional autonomy. Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy
said Puigdemont had five days to confirm that Catalonia had indeed cut free
from Spain; and if so, three more days to back down or Madrid would invoke
Article 155 of the country’s constitution that empowers the central government
to roll back a region’s autonomy and assume direct control if such region
defaults on “obligations imposed upon it by the constitution or other laws, or
acts in a way that is seriously prejudicial to the general interest of Spain.”
Puigdemont had on Tuesday cited a controversial referendum
lately held in his region as the basis for independence declaration. Catalonia
on October 1st forced its way through with a vote that the Spanish
government deemed illegal and tried to halt, and which the country’s
Constitutional Court forbade. The referendum’s outcome was predictable, as
opponents of the independence bid largely boycotted the ballot in which some 43
percent of the region’s 5.3million eligible voters were reported to have
participated, and from which Catalan leaders declared nearly 90 percent ‘yes’
vote for independence. There were reports of widespread irregularities in the
ballot, and pervasive violence as security agents laid siege on polling
stations to head off the vote.
Addressing the Catalan parliament in Barcelona, but with the
rapt attention of an apprehensive world audience, Puigdemont had said: “Thanks
to the results of the referendum of 1st October, Catalonia has
earned the right to be an independent state.” But he stepped back from
immediately activating the declaration, so to make room for talks with Madrid. “We
are reaching out in the hope of dialogue,” he stated.
His fudging did not wash, though, with hardcore Catalan
separatists, who described his speech as “an unacceptable act of traitorship.”
Radical elements within Catalonia’s political establishment, like the far-left
Popular Unity Candidacy party (CUP), wanted him to push through with the
independence declaration.
And neither did it assuage the irritation of Spanish
authorities in Madrid, who threatened the hitherto unused Article 155 to thwart
Catalonia’s bid. But even as Rajoy, the Spanish premier, foreclosed negotiation
on Catalan independence, which he considered the most serious threat to Spain’s
40-year-old democracy and a violation of the country’s constitution that
stipulates “indissoluble unity of the Spanish nation,” he indicated willingness
to discuss constitutional reforms that would further strengthen regional
autonomy.
As with all separatist bids, Catalan independence from Spain
is by no means a unanimous goal of all Catalans. In other words, there are many
pro-status quo Catalans over whom Puigdemont and his separatist crowd are
riding rough shod with their push. Besides those who boycotted the recent
referendum, for instance, there are political parties within that region
espousing a cardinal mission to leash the separatists. Even the mayor of
Catalonia’s capital city of Barcelona, Ada Colau, counseled restraint on both
sides and urged preference for dialogue. “I ask them (Puigdemont and Rajoy) not
to take any decision that might blow up the…space for dialogue and mediation. That
is the most courageous act they could do now,” she said.
On the other hand, Spanish politicians reached across the
partisan divide to root for the constitutional order, even though they
recognised a need to pursue reforms. That is to say they would not ‘play
politics’ with their country’s destiny. The leader of the main opposition
party, Pedro Sanchez of the Socialists, said his party would back action by the
government “in the face of any attempt to break social harmony.” His party and
the government, according to him, had agreed to explore using constitutional
reform to end the crisis, but this would focus on “how Catalonia remains in
Spain, and not how it leaves.”
Unilateral breakaways
are never a cakewalk – neither in accomplishing the goal nor in securing
legitimacy for the outcome
Catalonia’s independence bid faced other challenges, which
included the cold shoulder from the business and international communities.
Even with the economic primacy of the region, a stream of companies announced
plans to move their head offices out of the province in response to the crisis.
And contrary to apparent expectation by the Catalan leadership,
the international community tanked up on not wading in what was considered an
internal affair of Spain. Although the president of the European Council, Donald
Tusk, reportedly placed an 11th hour call to Puigdemont on Tuesday,
urging him to respect the constitutional order and not do anything that would
hinder dialogue, no third party has shown willingness to mediate the crisis. Meanwhile,
the European Union has made clear that should Catalonia break off from Spain,
the region would cease to be a part of the EU. A spokesman for German Chancellor
Angela Merkel said she had “affirmed her backing for the unity of Spain” in a
phone call with the Spanish premier, Mariano Rajoy. And in France, the government
said if Catalonia declared independence from Spain, it would not be recognised.
Unilateral breakaways are never a cakewalk – neither in
accomplishing the goal nor in securing legitimacy for the outcome. That is a
reality the recent manic push for Biafra secession from Nigeria by hotheaded
South-East youths seems to miss out on, and the reason why the moderate
disposition of the elders and political leaders of that region have moral
primacy. There is no question there are challenges of gross inequity in the
Nigerian federation today requiring urgent redress; and that is not just for
the Igbo, but even more so for ethnic minorities. And so, it is far from true
that Nigerian unity is settled, as President Muhammadu Buhari declared on his
return from medical leave recently. Nigerian unity must be renegotiated and the
federation restructured – a call that seems to be catching on now even in the
conservative North.
But the helmsman of Ohanaeze Ndigbo, John Nnia Nwodo, was
bang on the nail when he said last week that though the Igbo were unhappy with their
position in Nigeria, agitation for Biafra was off the mark. “We should forget
Biafra and insist on restructuring,” he admonished. That, to my mind, is a
realistic and more feasible option.
Comments